Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:45:56
Message-Id: 5827C5D0.1050105@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On 13/11/16 01:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2 > On 11/13/2016 02:40 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
3 >> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 8:24:12 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
4 >>> In either case the person affected can appeal to Council which makes
5 >>> the final decision.
6 >> If a problem went from Team Lead, or Leads, to a vote from the entire council.
7 >> An appeal should not be necessary. There should not be an appeal process or
8 >> need. Such things should not occur and everyone should be doing everything
9 >> possible to prevent it. Thus again nothing to appeal.
10 >>
11 > This is already the case where technical issues are discussed in a
12 > professional manner not involving personal conflicts.
13 >
14 >
15 With respect, Kristian, I really don't believe we have a problem with
16 technical matters ... ;]

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>