Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:44:33
Message-Id: 396f3c61-0c85-ac8f-f151-0bc09759c163@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 11/13/2016 02:40 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 8:24:12 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >>
4 >> In either case the person affected can appeal to Council which makes
5 >> the final decision.
6 >
7 > If a problem went from Team Lead, or Leads, to a vote from the entire council.
8 > An appeal should not be necessary. There should not be an appeal process or
9 > need. Such things should not occur and everyone should be doing everything
10 > possible to prevent it. Thus again nothing to appeal.
11 >
12
13 This is already the case where technical issues are discussed in a
14 professional manner not involving personal conflicts.
15
16
17 --
18 Kristian Fiskerstrand
19 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
20 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>