Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-05-14 | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 May 2013 17:30:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130501183021.2949cd49@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-05-14 by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:27:27 -0700 |
| 2 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > It's necessary, and the way to convince developers is to stop |
| 4 | > > providing a nasty hack as a not-really-working alternative. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > As downstream packagers, do we or can we really expect to have that |
| 7 | > much influence of upstream developers? If the big binary distros are |
| 8 | > willing to package these things without complaints, then how likely |
| 9 | > is it that upstream developers will change their ways? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Big binary distros already deal with this problem... |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-05-14 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |