| 1 |
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:36:09PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Here is the second part of the exercise. The current draft of the new |
| 3 |
> Gentoo copyright policy [2] arranges for two procedures: |
| 4 |
... |
| 5 |
> 2. In addition, according to the current policy draft, developers would |
| 6 |
> be encouraged to sign a "Gentoo Contributor License Agreement (CLA)". |
| 7 |
> Its current draft version is at [4]. However, this would be |
| 8 |
> completely voluntary and *not* be required. The exact workflow |
| 9 |
> hasn't been drafted yet, but PGP signing of the form would be one |
| 10 |
> possibility. (Also note that the form includes fields for real name |
| 11 |
> and postal address.) |
| 12 |
I have a nit question: |
| 13 |
Can we please call the agreement "FLA" instead of "CLA", since it is |
| 14 |
derived from FSFE's FLA-2.0, and is still a FLA at it's heart, rather |
| 15 |
than a USian-centric CLA? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
| 20 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 21 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| 22 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |
Archives