1 |
On 2017.05.11 08:17, Matthias Maier wrote: |
2 |
> Hello all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017, at 12:00 CDT, "Anthony G. Basile" |
5 |
> <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > Hi everyone, |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > The Gentoo Council will be meeting in two weeks. If anyone has any |
10 |
> > issues we need to discuss, please let me know and I'll put it on the |
11 |
> > agenda. Thanks. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would like to make a last minute proposal. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Proposal: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I ask the council to establish a procedure / team to moderate the |
18 |
> gentoo-project@ and gentoo-dev@ mailing lists: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> - In general the amount of moderation shall as minimal as possible |
21 |
> (in particular developers and long-time contributors |
22 |
> unconditionally green-lighted), |
23 |
> - but for non-developers abusing the mailing lists for their own |
24 |
> agenda their contributions shall be moderated. |
25 |
> - Similar to irc operators there shall be a decicated moderator |
26 |
> team |
27 |
> to ensure a quick and timely response. |
28 |
> - The moderator team shall be different from council members, and |
29 |
> ideally also comrel, such that these groups can act as a check |
30 |
> and |
31 |
> balance. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Rationale: |
34 |
> |
35 |
> The gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-project@ mailing lists nowadays serve |
36 |
> an important role for Gentoo development (e.g. mandatory |
37 |
> announcement, |
38 |
> RFCs, PATCH reviews). This function is currently severly impeded due |
39 |
> to the high level of noise and unrelated personal agenda [1]. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Best, |
42 |
> Matthias |
43 |
> |
44 |
> [1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/ |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
Team, |
48 |
|
49 |
We've been there and done that, lets not do it again. |
50 |
For those that want the history, read up on the Proctors procject. |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
Regards, |
54 |
|
55 |
Roy Bamford |
56 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
57 |
elections |
58 |
gentoo-ops |
59 |
forum-mods |