Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:52:34
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mkDvibwEHx-HF0Hy7WxZuRW6nUM4ALv+5KqQHj1f3jXQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals by Daniel Robbins
1 On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote:
2 >
3 > Ironically, being open and responsive to tinfoil-esque comments actually
4 > will do a great deal to dispel tinfoil-esque paranoia going forward.
5 >
6
7 While that seems like a reasonable hypothesis, I fear that it isn't
8 well-established with data.
9
10 In any case I support being open just to be open, and so far the
11 people who have been in dual-roles have chosen to recuse themselves,
12 so this seems mostly like a hypothetical argument.
13
14 --
15 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org>