| 1 |
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 08:28:39 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2019-07-21 at 02:48 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 07 Jul 2019 23:00:01 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > My second agenda item is: removing posting restrictions from gentoo-dev |
| 5 |
> > > mailing list. |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > I was on the Council that made those changes, and from retrospective I |
| 8 |
> > > believe the decision to be a mistake. It was made to workaround |
| 9 |
> > > a problem with inefficiency of ComRel, and we should have focused |
| 10 |
> > > on fixing ComRel instead. I don't believe it serves its purpose well |
| 11 |
> > > and IMO it causes more problems than it solves. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > We had the problem of the lists becoming unusable. Since person |
| 14 |
> > involved actively avoided bans, the only working technical mean |
| 15 |
> > available was to whitelist the gentoo-dev mail list. Other |
| 16 |
> > technical means like targeted banning apparently have had failed. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> For the record, this is oversimplfying. The main reason why the person |
| 19 |
> in question has bypassed the ban is because ComRel failed to deliver |
| 20 |
> a professional notice about the ban, and therefore provoked him to |
| 21 |
> publish it. Not saying it's justified or appropriate, saying it might |
| 22 |
> not have happened if we did things right. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I'm not aware of any case of deliberate repeated ban evasions that |
| 25 |
> required explicit action in the past. Are you? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
The person in question was banned many times and each time |
| 28 |
registered new e-mail and continued a flame. This is what is called |
| 29 |
the ban evasion and the only practical way to stop this is the |
| 30 |
white list. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Best regards, |
| 33 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives