| 1 |
On December 12, 2020 8:24:44 AM EST, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>On 2020.12.12 12:07, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> > I have a major concern with the concept of the council |
| 4 |
>> > deciding to close any part of the forum. Its like this ... |
| 5 |
>> > At present, Gentoo is a common carrier, like the mail. |
| 6 |
>> > The content of letters and parcels is of little concern to the |
| 7 |
>> > carrier. |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > Gentoos status could be changed by a council decision to |
| 10 |
>> > close any part of the forum from common carrier to publisher, |
| 11 |
>> > were the council seen to be exercising editorial control. |
| 12 |
>> > Being a publisher makes Gentoo liable for the published |
| 13 |
>> > content. Gentoo could not run the forums at all under those |
| 14 |
>> > conditions. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> This is misinformation at best, and deliberate confusion sowing at |
| 17 |
>> worst. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> I assume that you're talking about the US legal situation. [#] |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
><snip totally irrelevant material> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>> [...] |
| 25 |
>> ==================== |
| 26 |
>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> Cheers. |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
><snip references> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> -- |
| 38 |
>> Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 39 |
>> dilfridge@g.o |
| 40 |
>> Gentoo Linux developer |
| 41 |
>> (council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
>Rule 1 is never assume. |
| 45 |
>That makes the rest of your post irrelevant. |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
>In the UK, which selfishly, is all that matters to me, if I compile |
| 48 |
>and edit a community newsletter, I'm the publisher, with all the |
| 49 |
>liabilities |
| 50 |
>of a publisher. Like, say, the News of the World. I have editorial |
| 51 |
>control and am liable for the content. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
>When someone distributes that same newsletter by putting it |
| 54 |
>through the village letterboxes, they have no liability for the |
| 55 |
>content. |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
>In the same vein, is the council accidentality, through ignorance or |
| 58 |
>otherwise, in danger of making Gentoo a publisher, with all the |
| 59 |
>attached liability for content? |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
>I don't know the answer either. |
| 62 |
> |
| 63 |
>Oh, the News of the World folded after a lawsuit related to an |
| 64 |
>article it published. |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
This doesn't correlate. The problem is and has been, the content is not aligned with our community values and standards. |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
Simple enough. No need for legal shenanigans, liability, etc. |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-- |
| 71 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives