| 1 |
Dean Stephens: |
| 2 |
> On 12/29/14 15:06, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'll certainly agree that not everything needs a formal project. |
| 4 |
>> However, if a project wants to have authority/autonomy beyond |
| 5 |
>> anything-goes, then it should welcome members and elect a lead |
| 6 |
>> regularly. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> There is at least a defensible argument to be made that being able to |
| 9 |
> reject applicants is more important to being able to maintain a coherent |
| 10 |
> project than the often indicated duty to accept anyone who shows interest. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What about projects that don't even reject, but rather ignore |
| 14 |
devs/contributors? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We tell them to elect a new lead, so we don't have to deal with the |
| 17 |
people who screwed up, but can say "here, they formally are a functional |
| 18 |
project according to a random glep... problem solved". |
Archives