Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: chithanh@g.o
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees)
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:49:36
Message-Id: 51D1A506.70801@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On 07/01/2013 01:16 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
2 > But until
3 > then, if the kids cannot get along they shall play on separate playgrounds.
4
5 That separate playground is usually an overlay and it has already
6 happened, see "gamerlay" which is now terribly unmaintained and only has
7 one/two active users (no dev) who do not get any review and find it more
8 convenient than sunrise. That has lead to low QA and ebuilds scattered
9 across overlays instead of being in the tree. Eventually they even
10 overwrite crucial libraries like "libsdl" and break them.
11
12 Other _devs_ just open their own overlay for such ebuilds, because they
13 don't want to work with some project/herd.
14
15 Does that improve user experience? Is that the answer to a systematic
16 problem of inconsistency and stubbornness? Will that make any1
17 reconsider his attitude about being a maintainer and realize that it
18 means to serve the _user_?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>