| 1 |
Doug Freed: |
| 2 |
> GLEP 39 currently states that "[A project] may have one or many leads" |
| 3 |
> (Specification section, first list, last item). I believe (and a few |
| 4 |
> others agree) that this language is ambiguous, Some projects have |
| 5 |
> interpreted this language to mean that a project may have no lead, |
| 6 |
> while others believe the language is to be interpreted as meaning that |
| 7 |
> projects must have at least one lead. Therefore, I request that the |
| 8 |
> Council clarify the language of GLEP 39 to remove this ambiguity. I |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The council has already provided a clarification[0]: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
""" |
| 13 |
The wording of GLEP 39 was found to be unclear if not confusing (it |
| 14 |
states that a project "may have one or many leads", and that their |
| 15 |
selection "must occur at least once every 12 months"). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
After discussion the following points were agreed upon: |
| 18 |
* The Gentoo Wiki project page template should be enhanced to show the |
| 19 |
last lead election date for each project. |
| 20 |
* The council sends an e-mail to the gentoo-project mailing list asking |
| 21 |
projects to consider electing a lead and confirming her/him regularly. |
| 22 |
""" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[0] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20150913-summary.txt |
Archives