| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 02/14/2015 10:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 6 |
> <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> We need to resolve this discussion somehow, by formulating a |
| 9 |
>> clear policy. Which is why I'm putting it up here for discussion |
| 10 |
>> and will ask to add it to the next council meeting agenda. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I tend to agree with what seems to be the general sentiment. As |
| 13 |
> long as we still accept patches via bugzilla/etc, then we aren't |
| 14 |
> "depending" on github. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That depends on where the primary repository of the project lies. |
| 17 |
Whether it is primary on gentoo infra or if GitHub is de-facto primary |
| 18 |
repository. If the latter it is a problem. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 22 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 23 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU38EwAAoJEP7VAChXwav60ZsIAJb16/W1X0YiVQx5sIb1bvP2 |
| 27 |
Is7P4+Sp6ZCuXqY0/PjXLua0w+K4sP3uCLRuSOMrfSASGH6K+Wd41sFBkeDrUbyE |
| 28 |
9g5vPkVWXM9C92eBmdEPJhDOZ5FmPAeLmSBqLCcXIs5BivBrfZMUXvlyDcHFtvUk |
| 29 |
FGbcGf9Mjk0c8z5qjlDmtfnu2SBbQZjAaXX4S1+1tkZxzypiPUDkQmG7Yys9clfH |
| 30 |
TGQ+yhVpp6K4Dq4AbK3rxn55eI80I8nHt6MFM7d7Ql64eaC7FmTJlr9ZozLqmTux |
| 31 |
mJO1Ne0xnTW7JMncar0gehRWwoqcnYTzqyzbqtHHKA6zpTGLOZ051CKDdXf9vVg= |
| 32 |
=dOBL |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives