| 1 |
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 2 |
<dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We need to resolve this discussion somehow, by formulating a clear policy. |
| 5 |
> Which is why I'm putting it up here for discussion and will ask to add it to |
| 6 |
> the next council meeting agenda. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I tend to agree with what seems to be the general sentiment. As long |
| 9 |
as we still accept patches via bugzilla/etc, then we aren't |
| 10 |
"depending" on github. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
FOSS alternatives are to be preferred, but since we don't have those |
| 13 |
set up, I don't see why we have to live without anything in the |
| 14 |
meantime. If somebody wants to host such a thing, I'd encourage them |
| 15 |
to do so, and work with infra if they'll accept help. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives