Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-11-13
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:08:38
Message-Id: 1478167711.1098.30.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-11-13 by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 El mié, 02-11-2016 a las 21:05 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
2 > [...]
3 > A simple comment is not derailing a thread. It was on topic. A
4 > council agenda 
5 > item may be lack of arch testers. The council knowing there are
6 > people who 
7 > could be tapped for such is on topic.
8 >
9 > Unlike the rather rude reply which was completely unnecessary. I
10 > surely do not 
11 > go around telling others what they need do or not. Such posts would
12 > be better 
13 > direct than to a public list...
14 >
15 Maybe one option that the "official" members of relevant arch testers
16 teams could have for allowing faster/easier stabilization would be to
17 rely on github PR (specially for the cases of "exotic" arches that will
18 have less man power for committing "manually" everything :/)

Replies