1 |
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:40 PM, Matthias Maier <tamiko@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> - overruling council (and comrel?) decisions with a 2:1 majority |
4 |
> |
5 |
|
6 |
While I could see this making sense for most Council/QA decisions, I'm |
7 |
skeptical of how this could work for Comrel, given that nobody would |
8 |
have anything to go off of, unless we made these matters public. |
9 |
|
10 |
I could see it possibly working if we made it clear that there is no |
11 |
expectation of privacy for anybody bringing a complaint, and that the |
12 |
entire matter would be made public if the accused wished to appeal it |
13 |
to a general resolution. Then it would be up to the person who was |
14 |
subject to discipline to allow a general vote. If they did not allow |
15 |
this, then the Council (or Comrel, if no appeal) would have the final |
16 |
say and it could not be appealed. If they did allow this, then the |
17 |
entire record would be made public and available for a general vote. |
18 |
The accused would have full access to the record before deciding |
19 |
whether to make it public, so there would be no surprises. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm not a super-big fan of this, but I see it as the only reasonable |
22 |
way to let Comrel decisions turn into a general resolution. Otherwise |
23 |
people basically have to vote blind. |
24 |
|
25 |
On the flip side, it would let the accused leave quietly with no |
26 |
public defamation/etc if they so wished, but in doing so they wouldn't |
27 |
really have much room to complain about the process being closed, |
28 |
since they were the one who decided to keep it that way. On the other |
29 |
hand, if they insisted on a public proceeding then everybody can |
30 |
decide for themselves what is appropriate. |
31 |
|
32 |
The main downside is that we'd need to make it clear to anybody |
33 |
issuing a complaint that they would not get a say in whether what they |
34 |
submit was shared with the accused or the public. Otherwise we would |
35 |
be taking that decision out of the accused's hands, and it basically |
36 |
defeats the point in having this sort of appeal available. This might |
37 |
potentially have a chilling effect on anybody who might want to bring |
38 |
a complaint, since it could become public if the accused so desired. |
39 |
Either way I think things like this are best made clear up-front so |
40 |
there are no surprises. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Rich |