1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 08 Jun 2014, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> El dom, 08-06-2014 a las 16:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió: |
4 |
>> Many eclasses now use a mechanism equivalent to the one in C header |
5 |
>> files, which seems to do the job. |
6 |
|
7 |
> Last time I checked, there were still some eclasses not doing that |
8 |
> (either the "spank" way or the way from python -r1 eclasses). Not |
9 |
> sure if this was intended and why that eclasses are pending :/ If |
10 |
> there is no technical issue in fixing them (probably with the way |
11 |
> used in python eclasses ;)), why not simply go ahead and fix them? |
12 |
|
13 |
The feature is strictly needed only for eclasses that are inherited |
14 |
by another eclass. (If we would distinguish between eclasses and |
15 |
"eclass libraries" then it would be clearer where it is needed and |
16 |
where it is not.) |
17 |
|
18 |
Ulrich |