Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 20:36:08
Message-Id: be1463ea-22bb-eaf4-afc6-3ef9e4340ae6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 03/10/16 22:16, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > [00:59:50] <wltjr> its a community channel, and I am still a foundation member
3 > fool
4 > I never directly attacked, called anyone names, insults etc. I guess fool
5 > could be seen as a name calling, but I can thank of many much more harsh and
6 > using fowl language. Though one comment implying lack of thick skin could be
7 > taken out of context and seen as profanity. Though I have seen far worse.
8 > [...]
9 > If we were talking straight CoC. Its likely members of comrel/devrel would
10 > have faced policing action themselves.... There were much greater policy
11 > violations by their own members...
12
13 You may have a point there. I'd agree in several cases comrel/devrel
14 action (or lack of it) have made things worse.
15
16 I believe your technical contributions could indeed be very helpful for
17 Gentoo and community. However, it seems wise to pick your battles in
18 that case. It doesn't seem productive to contest so many things at a
19 time about project you're trying to join.
20
21 Paweł

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy Gregory Woodbury <redwolfe@×××××.com>