1 |
Hi Mart, |
2 |
|
3 |
I agree with every sentence from your email. |
4 |
|
5 |
Rich made a great example about the rabbit hole. I don't think we |
6 |
should blindly follow the social contract. |
7 |
|
8 |
Just want to add that Github has pushed forward so many open source |
9 |
projects that we must ask ourselves a different question: |
10 |
|
11 |
Is Gentoo willing to say "no" to the new users, developers and the |
12 |
speed of development just because Github is not FOSS? |
13 |
|
14 |
As Rich said, Gentoo has always been a bit pragmatic. I think it |
15 |
should be an easy question for any pragmatic team. |
16 |
|
17 |
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
18 |
> On L, 2015-02-14 at 16:37 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
19 |
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
20 |
>> <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
21 |
>> > |
22 |
>> > We need to resolve this discussion somehow, by formulating a clear policy. |
23 |
>> > Which is why I'm putting it up here for discussion and will ask to add it to |
24 |
>> > the next council meeting agenda. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> I tend to agree with what seems to be the general sentiment. As long |
27 |
>> as we still accept patches via bugzilla/etc, then we aren't |
28 |
>> "depending" on github. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> FOSS alternatives are to be preferred, but since we don't have those |
31 |
>> set up, I don't see why we have to live without anything in the |
32 |
>> meantime. If somebody wants to host such a thing, I'd encourage them |
33 |
>> to do so, and work with infra if they'll accept help. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> That is a good question. |
36 |
> I'm sorry if I am the only one to point this out, but: |
37 |
> We do NOT have even a WEB VIEW of our OFFICIAL overlays to see what is |
38 |
> going on there without BLINDLY cloning git URIs randomly! |
39 |
> Why should contributors care ONE BIT about things outside their comfort |
40 |
> zone of contributions, which is github in many cases these days? |
41 |
> After 6 months of complete blindness on official overlays, I was |
42 |
> eventually pointed at an outside cgit which shows what's going on there. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> After 2 years of talking, we are still using CVS. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> It is not surprising one bit that GitHub is the last hope to people |
47 |
> hoping to help out, with some folks willing to get their contributions |
48 |
> to actually MATTER. |
49 |
> We have failed the community to provide any reasonable free software |
50 |
> ways to contribute. So semi-open source ways it is. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> With all the respect to the infra team they have done with their |
54 |
> existing capabilities, but we need to do better and find better ways to |
55 |
> achieve what we can with existing resources and fix this completely sad |
56 |
> state. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> Mart |
60 |
> |
61 |
> |