1 |
On 01/14/2015 01:46 PM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
2 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On 01/13/2015 07:43 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
>>> Wanted to share my thoughts on where I think Gentoo should go, in terms |
6 |
>>> of direction. Would love to hear your thoughts. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> http://dberkholz.com/2015/01/13/gentoo-needs-focus-to-stay-relevant/ |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I think that improved binary package support will allow Gentoo to |
12 |
>> compete with binary distros, making Gentoo applicable to a much wider |
13 |
>> audience. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> As far as I understand we should focus on something that other distros |
16 |
> fail at. (I'm not saying we should ignore binary package support, but |
17 |
> definitely it's place is not in top-3.) |
18 |
|
19 |
Well, maybe you could say that other distros fail at providing an |
20 |
extremely flexible build-system to feed their binary package |
21 |
repositories? If you look at it this way, Gentoo's missing piece is the |
22 |
binary package repository support. |
23 |
|
24 |
Thanks, |
25 |
Zac |