| 1 |
>> One idea I had infra-wise was to expand the idea of our devspace. |
| 2 |
>> Increase the footprint of our virtualizatoin infra and (on request) give |
| 3 |
>> devs a VM for dev work. Possibly even do some arm64 or ppc64 work there |
| 4 |
>> too. Beyond that, running a binhost may be an idea, get people |
| 5 |
>> bootstrapped faster. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I do agree with K_F in that targeting existing confrences would be nice. |
| 8 |
>> I think the two we'd have the most luck in would be fosdem scale. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> A bug bounty program sounds neat, we could take input on bugs to target |
| 11 |
>> from council I think. (I personally would like to work on make gentoo |
| 12 |
>> better support openstack-ansible :D). |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It would be nice to also have an official way to quickly start off full |
| 16 |
> up-to-date system images, possibly in multiple variants. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So I have been running an unofficial binhost server for a while until my provider had problems. |
| 20 |
It helps a lot to have it especially for architectures that are not processor front loaded (arm v6 and v7 / arm64). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What prevents us from running an Official binhost? Do we really need Foundation approval (nothing against Foundation). |
| 23 |
It would just be forming an official project would’t it? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
BlueKnight |
Archives