| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Its fine as long as infra is the centre of our operations. Because github |
| 5 |
> is so much better than cvs provided by infra (sorry infra its true) I worry |
| 6 |
> that we'll depend on it too much. To be honest, I love the entire github |
| 7 |
> workflow and would feel much better if we could just own it ourselves. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
In case folks on this list haven't seen it before, Gerrit[1] offers a |
| 11 |
workflow that might be attractive to Gentoo, over and above GitHub's. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Some example's of Gerrit in use include the Qt project [2] and Coreboot |
| 14 |
project [3] |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Of special interest is that Gerrit provides an API by which verification |
| 17 |
scripts can be run against each patch under consideration, such a repoman. |
| 18 |
It further lets authorized users to push a patch from the web, without |
| 19 |
needing to open the git commandline, similar to how GitHub pull requests |
| 20 |
work. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Just food for thought! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers |
| 25 |
--Michael Jones |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 31 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 32 |
> E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 33 |
> GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 34 |
> GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
[1] https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ |
| 39 |
[2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/status:open,n,z |
| 40 |
[3] http://review.coreboot.org/#/q/status:open |
Archives