| 1 |
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:11:55 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Whichever route we go, there's also the UI question: how do we |
| 4 |
> > present this to users in a sensible way? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The intent is not to anything clever but just mask the package. Intel |
| 7 |
> users don't want mesa without support for their card; they simply |
| 8 |
> don't want the broken version at all. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It should be presented alike regular package.mask, with the whole |
| 11 |
> atom string. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm not sure that it's that simple: what if a user has, say, intel |
| 14 |
turned on only because it's on by default in profiles? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives