| 1 |
Dnia 2015-02-14, o godz. 21:48:22 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> whenever the suggestion comes up to enable contributions to Gentoo via Github |
| 5 |
> pull requests, we also encounter discussion of the Gentoo Social Contract. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The two points that are seen as conflicting are |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> * The software running Github is closed source, proprietary. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> * The Gentoo Social Contract states [1]: |
| 12 |
> "Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or metadata unless it |
| 13 |
> conforms to the GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public |
| 14 |
> License, the Creative Commons - Attribution/Share Alike or some other license |
| 15 |
> approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI)." |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe you should start by providing an alternative conforming to this. |
| 18 |
For a start, Infra should stop running proprietary software. However, |
| 19 |
so far they have been openly refusing to publish their scripts. |
| 20 |
In fact, I've been recently asked to put my open source overlay QA |
| 21 |
scripts [1] in a restricted-access repository. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[1]:https://bitbucket.org/mgorny/overlay-qa-tools |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives