| 1 |
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 12:03 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> David Seifert schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 15:36 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Finally please also allow me to ask why 30+ days after all of |
| 5 |
> > > this |
| 6 |
> > > started, nobody from forums team took yet any action, i.e. the |
| 7 |
> > > post I |
| 8 |
> > > showed on Friday is still untouched. Have I missed an issued |
| 9 |
> > > warning/ban? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > I think the forum mods agree with you: |
| 12 |
> > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-8543599.html#8543599 |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > > Of the random set I surveyed, I did not find any posts that, in |
| 15 |
> > > my |
| 16 |
> > > opinion, rose to the level of a violation. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> "I will note that due to the volume of poorly explained reports, I |
| 19 |
> gave up |
| 20 |
> before reading nearly all the reported posts, so some of the reported |
| 21 |
> posts |
| 22 |
> may well deserve to be reported." |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Ok, so overloading the forum moderation with frivolous requests will |
| 25 |
> obviously lead to the legitimate requests getting inadequate |
| 26 |
> attention. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I consider those who started digging in historical posts and mass |
| 29 |
> reporting |
| 30 |
> them as acting in bad faith here. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Do you consider the one who's overloading everyone with huge volume of |
| 33 |
replies with no or almost no actual information in them on the mailing |
| 34 |
lists to be acting in good faith? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Best regards, |
| 38 |
Michał Górny |
Archives