1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 20-03-2012 22:34:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
4 |
>> From my point of view, both decisions could be made at the same meeting: |
5 |
>> 1º Should we discuss it? -> Yes -> go to 2º // No -> end |
6 |
>> 2º Discuss alternatives |
7 |
|
8 |
Actually, my plan was not only to discuss 2º, but to vote on it in the |
9 |
same meeting. |
10 |
|
11 |
> IMO we don't have to waste a (part of a) meeting on deciding if we |
12 |
> want to address the issue at all. We (council) should just reach |
13 |
> that conclusion here on-list, so we can prepare for the actual votes |
14 |
> in actual council meeting. |
15 |
|
16 |
Or the option of keeping the status quo could be one of the |
17 |
alternatives of the vote. It would be six alternatives then. |
18 |
|
19 |
I can prepare a Condorcet (Schulze method) vote, just for the case |
20 |
that we don't get an absolute majority for one of them. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ulrich |