Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:04:38
Message-Id: 20329.36006.112786.843272@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03 by Fabian Groffen
1 >>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2
3 > On 20-03-2012 22:34:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
4 >> From my point of view, both decisions could be made at the same meeting:
5 >> 1º Should we discuss it? -> Yes -> go to 2º // No -> end
6 >> 2º Discuss alternatives
7
8 Actually, my plan was not only to discuss 2º, but to vote on it in the
9 same meeting.
10
11 > IMO we don't have to waste a (part of a) meeting on deciding if we
12 > want to address the issue at all. We (council) should just reach
13 > that conclusion here on-list, so we can prepare for the actual votes
14 > in actual council meeting.
15
16 Or the option of keeping the status quo could be one of the
17 alternatives of the vote. It would be six alternatives then.
18
19 I can prepare a Condorcet (Schulze method) vote, just for the case
20 that we don't get an absolute majority for one of them.
21
22 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03 Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>