| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> However, some people raised the point that we should provide stable stages |
| 4 |
> for these architectures and drop everything else to ~arch. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So if the Council votes 'NO' to the original question, vote on whether |
| 7 |
> only @system should |
| 8 |
> be stable for these architectures. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'd be interested in whether anybody on the arch teams themselves |
| 11 |
actually supports this proposal. I don't think I actually heard much |
| 12 |
commentary in that thread one way or another from arch team members, |
| 13 |
which is as good a reason as any to just completely drop the arch to |
| 14 |
testing. If some spoke up about being willing to keep up with the |
| 15 |
@system packages then considering allowing stable keywords for those |
| 16 |
would make more sense. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And yes, I was one of the proponents of the model I tossed out there. |
| 19 |
A good idea that isn't going to be properly supported isn't a good |
| 20 |
idea. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives