1 |
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 21:52:57 +0000 |
6 |
>> "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
<snip> |
9 |
|
10 |
>>> It may come to some surprise to you (and others) that Craig is not the |
11 |
>>> only prospective dev who was somewhat perplexed with the attitude |
12 |
>>> towards select Gentoo Devs, who seemed, on the face of it, to be |
13 |
>>> actively contributing to the Gentoo project. There were at least six of |
14 |
>>> us (if not seven, possibly more) who were actively considering and |
15 |
>>> pursuing becoming a Gentoo developer, who all felt that we felt uneasy |
16 |
>>> about progression, not helped by the problems of a lack of active |
17 |
>>> recruiters and other issues within the Recruiters project, which have |
18 |
>>> hopefully now been resolved. There is a mild concern that the only |
19 |
>>> remaining recruiter, may have a bias against some of the prospective |
20 |
>>> recruits, as having been "tainted" by the former Gentoo Dev who was |
21 |
>>> ousted from the Proxy Maintenance project. As non-devs, we have no |
22 |
>>> recourse to council to ask for this to be investigated, and we don't |
23 |
>>> consider ourselves to have a 'voice' to express our opinions and |
24 |
>>> frustrations with the Gentoo 'system' as we observe it. It seems ironic |
25 |
>>> that we are unable to influence the procedures that would help us be |
26 |
>>> represented, and hence the only outlets we have are the mailing lists |
27 |
>>> and third-party platforms. If anyone can suggest the correct course of |
28 |
>>> action that any prospective non-dev contributor might have, I'm sure |
29 |
>>> there are a few ears who would be interested in the response. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> The first and most important person for a prospective developer is |
32 |
>> his/her mentor. If you have a mentor, then by all means talk to him/her |
33 |
>> first and he/she'll represent your case to the Council or any |
34 |
>> appropriate community members. |
35 |
>> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> This actually does bring up a side point I've been curious about. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Do you need to be a current, or even potential/former developer to have a |
40 |
> mentor? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Can you have a mentor if you're a mere user? |
43 |
|
44 |
The "mentor" figure is meant as the developer(s) that help someone being |
45 |
recruited. However, the role of "mentor" is something that we can have |
46 |
anywhere. So if there's any developer you respect and you're able to |
47 |
create a connection to, then by all means please establish / foster that |
48 |
connection and "use it" to improve your knowlege and presence on Gentoo. |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
About the point raised by "M. J. Everitt" and Craig, if you were trying to |
52 |
join Gentoo, we aren't going to reject you just because of who was your |
53 |
mentor. We do evaluate everyone for their own, not for who was their |
54 |
mentor. Part of that evaluation is related to "social skills". |
55 |
Despite all the recent discussion here, we do need to take into |
56 |
consideration "social skills". Even if we do technical work, we need to |
57 |
do it as part of a community, so it's essential that people are able to |
58 |
work with others and reach compromises. At times, it seems some forget |
59 |
that it's easier to improve technical skills and to get more knowledge, |
60 |
than it is to improve our interaction with others. Recent Gentoo history, |
61 |
imho, only proves that some people are even resistant to that (learning |
62 |
"social skills"). |
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
Regards, |
66 |
|
67 |
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
68 |
Gentoo Developer |