| 1 |
On 17/07/14 15:15, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/17/14 07:49, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dirkjan Ochtman: |
| 4 |
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Doesn't that make the vote invalid? |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> I don't see why it would. Maybe if voters would have known in advance |
| 8 |
>>> that their votes might be compromised. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> IMO, it doesn't matter if the violation had an effect on the result. It |
| 12 |
>> matters that there was a violation of procedure. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Unfortunately it does have an effect since council members now know |
| 16 |
> who voted for them and who didn't and this can make for bad feelings, |
| 17 |
> impartiality etc. I'm not sure how to deal with this since a re-vote |
| 18 |
> will not make this knowledge go away. While not a perfect solution, |
| 19 |
> maybe we should just try to ignore it as much as possible? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
For what's it worth, I couldn't care less if my voting is public or not, |
| 23 |
it's nothing personal to anyone, it's only what I think is best for the |
| 24 |
distribution |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
And I hope others feel the same way (even those whom didn't get elected) |
Archives