| 1 |
On 07/17/14 07:49, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dirkjan Ochtman: |
| 3 |
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:38 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Doesn't that make the vote invalid? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I don't see why it would. Maybe if voters would have known in advance |
| 7 |
>> that their votes might be compromised. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> IMO, it doesn't matter if the violation had an effect on the result. It |
| 11 |
> matters that there was a violation of procedure. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Unfortunately it does have an effect since council members now know who |
| 15 |
voted for them and who didn't and this can make for bad feelings, |
| 16 |
impartiality etc. I'm not sure how to deal with this since a re-vote |
| 17 |
will not make this knowledge go away. While not a perfect solution, |
| 18 |
maybe we should just try to ignore it as much as possible? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 23 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 24 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 25 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives