1 |
On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 02:04 +0100, Andrey Utkin wrote: |
2 |
> Summary: |
3 |
> Could we please look for the possibilities to deliver more, given extra reward |
4 |
> from users interested in that happening? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> There are many good motivations to contribute to FOSS, and the fact that |
8 |
> somebody contributes means some motivation is in place. But given stable |
9 |
> motivation and real life arrangements, the level of effort would stay in some |
10 |
> predictable range - there is some optimum, where contributing either more or |
11 |
> less hurts some needs of the contributor. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> But what if contributing more than usual would be rewarded more than usual? |
14 |
> For example, a person with a flexible job schedule may be willing to switch to |
15 |
> 4 workdays week and spend one full day each week contributing, given reasonable |
16 |
> remuneration - not necessarily equal to their employer's rates, but not peanuts. |
17 |
|
18 |
Three grumpy notes for a start: |
19 |
|
20 |
1. So far 'more than usual' tends to get punished. There are developers |
21 |
who believe that if you manage more time to contribute than he does, you |
22 |
get unfair advantage at shaping the distribution over him. You gotta |
23 |
convince them for a start. |
24 |
|
25 |
2. Are developers hired to work full-time on Gentoo going to qualify for |
26 |
the extra money too? |
27 |
|
28 |
3. Ideas like this tend to get rejected because people are concerned |
29 |
about some people arbitrarily deciding who gets the money, and who |
30 |
doesn't, and other people disagreeing with their decisions. Just think |
31 |
of the one developer who used to do a lot of work, and then people had |
32 |
to spend twice as much time fixing it. |
33 |
|
34 |
> I think if we find such possibilities - the levels of service quality which |
35 |
> we're not going to meet given the status quo, but which we're going to meet |
36 |
> fairly confidently given funding - some of these would be interesting enough to |
37 |
> wide users community to fund them. |
38 |
|
39 |
I'm sorry but I have no clue what this means. Could you translate it |
40 |
from marketing to English? |
41 |
|
42 |
> |
43 |
> The idea of crowdfunding major projects has been brought up in 2015, and |
44 |
> unfortunately it hasn't turned into action: |
45 |
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/0f35aba409bc64e539a88895bfe6cc42 |
46 |
> |
47 |
> If you are a member of some projects within Gentoo: |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Do you know some specific promises, or service level or quality criteria which |
50 |
> it makes sense to meet but which you don't consistently achieve because of |
51 |
> resource constraints? |
52 |
|
53 |
We could start with thousands of bugs that get ignored. With |
54 |
the recent effort by ago, I don't manage to fix even trivial issues |
55 |
immediately (as I used to) and instead do a few recent dev-python/ bugs |
56 |
every day. |
57 |
|
58 |
> Do you believe the goals of your project really matter for quality of life of |
59 |
> real users so that they'd give non-zero amount of money for this criteria to be |
60 |
> consistently met (as opposed to current inferior quality)? |
61 |
> |
62 |
> If yes, why not try fundraising to ensure that such a higher quality bar is |
63 |
> met, say, throughout the next year? |
64 |
|
65 |
Could you elaborate a bit on what kind of fundraising do you mean? Are |
66 |
you talking of asking for donations earmarked for a specific project, |
67 |
and distributed by Foundation afterwards? Or dedicated to specific |
68 |
developers? |
69 |
|
70 |
-- |
71 |
Best regards, |
72 |
Michał Górny |