Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:06:00
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=u9Ub==e19WDamjeOZ3DrMaLh+LAXVqJEB_0KVwt7eRg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:31 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
2 <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > It is really amazing what is tolerated, and what is considered a CoC violation.
5 >
6
7 Keep in mind that "tolerated" and "CoC violation" are different
8 things. Something can be a CoC violation and be either tolerated or
9 not. There are a lot of things I'd prefer not be tolerated which are,
10 and a lot of it comes down to trying to find a balance in enforcement.
11 The stuff that does get serious enforcement tends to be fairly
12 egregious from what I've seen, and rarely are all the details of what
13 actually happened the things that discussed on the lists or the things
14 that are commonly known.
15
16 Put another way, from what I've observed Comrel is about as
17 understaffed as any other part of Gentoo, so for them to go through
18 all the trouble to actually do something to somebody, they really have
19 to get their attention in a sustained way...
20
21 --
22 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] ComRel / disciplinary action reform proposal "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>