1 |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:17:25 -0500 |
2 |
"William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I do not see businesses spending money on Gentoo for a variety of factors. As |
5 |
> a business owner myself I have no incentive. Gentoo would waste my money and |
6 |
> not direct it toward development. Gentoo has no plans to use the money to |
7 |
> further development. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I would be better off doing what companies do now. Hire people who are Gentoo |
10 |
> developers, and/or can become one. Then I can pay them to do directly what I |
11 |
> want. By passing anything within Gentoo, Trustees, Council, etc. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Companies are doing this now. They have no reason to give money to Gentoo |
14 |
|
15 |
When you talk about yourself, I think you're not asking the right question. |
16 |
|
17 |
Given: |
18 |
|
19 |
- There are opensource organisations |
20 |
- There are companies that give them money |
21 |
- This is a thing |
22 |
- These organisations typically don't have focused directed outcomes from said |
23 |
donations ( because if the donations were earmarked it would be a payment, |
24 |
for services rendered, not a donation ) |
25 |
|
26 |
Why do companies give their money away? |
27 |
|
28 |
Also, have you considered Gentoo *could* create workflows where given gentoo |
29 |
developers do specified volumes of work, planned in advance, for pay, using |
30 |
money given to them by organisations? |
31 |
|
32 |
Grant Structure. |
33 |
|
34 |
And its not like Gentoo doesn't need developers, or have lots of ugly things |
35 |
that require somebody to basically be a full time developer to get it done. |
36 |
|
37 |
Hence, Companies that *USE* Gentoo are the primary audience *because* they use Gentoo, |
38 |
and are thus a natural benefactor from any Gentoo improvement. |
39 |
|
40 |
And as Gentoo is important to their businesses success, it makes sense to invest in that |
41 |
infrastructure you're otherwise getting for free. |