| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:13:17PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> As I've said earlier in the thread, I'm not talking about bugs that are |
| 3 |
> in process. I'm talking about bugs where nothing has started to happen. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
So, if we don't want hard timeouts, is there another option? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
My concern is when a reporter opens a bug then the bug sits there for an |
| 8 |
extended period of time with no one addressing it. |
| 9 |
I would argue that after a certain time window passes the reporter starts to |
| 10 |
think that comrel doesn't care about the issue, |
| 11 |
and the reportee would not like it either if action was taken |
| 12 |
against them for something they did 6 months ago. Imo comrel |
| 13 |
reports/complaints/whatever you want to call them are time sensitive. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
William |
Archives