1 |
I'll give it to this list outright. |
2 |
|
3 |
I have problems believing in QA competence when I read comments like these: |
4 |
|
5 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473#c14 |
6 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473#c17 |
7 |
|
8 |
You even blocked me out of the bug. I mean... wtf is happening here? I'm |
9 |
not even sure the list can read those bug comments to understand what I |
10 |
mean. |
11 |
|
12 |
I used to believe it's lack of manpower/time or even laziness, but I am |
13 |
not sure anymore. |
14 |
|
15 |
Funnily... the meeting summary of march is lost where you were supposed |
16 |
to vote on the tinderbox matter. I am not sure either if that is "by |
17 |
accident" anymore. I pinged you guys often enough. No one seems to have |
18 |
the logs anymore. |
19 |
|
20 |
Anyway, I had less trouble getting responses from the old QA team. When |
21 |
I ask you guys, I usually get one of these responses (or similar): |
22 |
* nothing, unless I ping you after 2 weeks again |
23 |
* "probably not in QAs scope" |
24 |
* "post on dev ML first, we don't know what to think" |
25 |
* "not sure if that's our business, appeal to council" |
26 |
|
27 |
Not sure what's worth QA if they don't have strong opinions and try to |
28 |
avoid to piss off people. |
29 |
|
30 |
I used to ask QA for guidance beforehand on delicate matters before I |
31 |
escalated elsewhere or chose a particular approach. That doesn't really |
32 |
work anymore, instead people expect me to fire up the bikeshedding |
33 |
dev-ML which is the worst place to get ideas and do constructive |
34 |
brainstorming. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
I expect infra to unblock bug 473 now. This is unacceptable. |