| 1 |
W dniu wto, 31.10.2017 o godzinie 04∶52 -0700, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
| 2 |
napisał: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 4 |
> <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2017, 00:17:38 CET schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > We've put a significant effort to make it convenient to use GitHub to |
| 8 |
> > > contribute to Gentoo. Many users have appreciated that, and so did many |
| 9 |
> > > developers. I think we can call that a success. However, I don't think |
| 10 |
> > > that's really successful enough. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > The main goal for using GitHub was to make it easy both for users to |
| 13 |
> > > submit their contributions, and for Gentoo developers to review |
| 14 |
> > > and merge them. However, for that to work out we'd actually have to have |
| 15 |
> > > more Gentoo developers *care* and we don't have that. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > At the moment we have 22508 open bugs in bugzilla... should we maybe close |
| 18 |
> > that too? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> ++ |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Open bugs/PRs that are no longer relevant are noise, but open bugs/PRs |
| 23 |
> that are still valid are actually signal. The more of these that you |
| 24 |
> leave open, the greater the chance that one will get fixed. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Except that open PRs quickly become irrelevant or semi-relevant, |
| 27 |
compared to the time which it takes to merge them. In the end, people |
| 28 |
actually end up applying fixes to old versions while skipping the newest |
| 29 |
because it was added independently. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
And then some people will come and yell at you that you are using |
| 32 |
'unofficial workflow' to 'hide' that signal from them. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Best regards, |
| 36 |
Michał Górny |
Archives