| 1 |
On Saturday 10 May 2014 12:46:31 hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> Samuli Suominen: |
| 3 |
> > On 09/05/14 21:37, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>> It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of |
| 5 |
> >>> each package to determine it for himself, no global USE="gtk" |
| 6 |
> >>> possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use. |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no results. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I'm not so sure, it seems QA is picking policies as per what some loud |
| 11 |
> > people on the ML say as opposed to giving overwhelming technical arguments |
| 12 |
> > their proper weight |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Well, if QA team members confuses "bugs" with "bug reports" and say they |
| 15 |
> don't want to do actual work (aka tinderbox), because it would cause |
| 16 |
> more "bugs", then I have serious doubts about their technical |
| 17 |
> understanding of certain issues. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It's not about "want", it's about having the resources (mostly time) to do so. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If you wish to experience that for yourself - just build everything (I can |
| 22 |
give you a script to do so), and then triage bugs. It's great fun for the first |
| 23 |
few hundred failures :) |
Archives