1 |
On sob, 2017-05-06 at 16:34 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> Am Samstag, 29. April 2017, 19:00:34 CEST schrieb Anthony G. Basile: |
3 |
> > Hi everyone, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > The Gentoo Council will be meeting in two weeks. If anyone has any |
6 |
> > issues we need to discuss, please let me know and I'll put it on the |
7 |
> > agenda. Thanks. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I've converted the arches.desc proposal into a GLEP, taking (some of) the |
10 |
> mailing list comments into account. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:72 |
13 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge/GLEP:72 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> (the texts are identical at the moment, but if there are additional comments I |
16 |
> can more easily adapt the version in my user space). |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I would like the council to talk about it and potentially give it a go-ahead. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> An implementation is still missing though. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
...and a rationale section to describe why you did the things this way. |
24 |
|
25 |
Few notes: |
26 |
|
27 |
1. I think your example is a bit misleading -- unless I'm missing |
28 |
something, mips would be 'unstable' right now, and m68k would be |
29 |
'testing'. |
30 |
|
31 |
2. I can't say I like using magical keywords like 'testing' |
32 |
and 'unstable'; they're going to be confusing long-term (compare: |
33 |
the mess with stable/exp/dev for profiles). But I don't have a very good |
34 |
idea how to it better right now. |
35 |
|
36 |
3. What is the use case for 'broken'? Are we ever going to use that? |
37 |
|
38 |
Plus, you have a few typos, you need to wikify it and other minor blah |
39 |
blah. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Best regards, |
43 |
Michał Górny |