1 |
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:56:05PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
2 |
> Overall, I agree with both sides |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 1) What Chí-Thanh said is true: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Yes, cooperation is better. But the method how to achieve cooperation is |
7 |
> convincing through arguments,... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> 2) What Rich said is also true: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Maintaining a package is a privilege conditioned |
12 |
> on using that power in alignment with our philosophies, not a right. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The main problem here is finding the right balance between convincing |
16 |
> (first choice) and mandating (if convincing fails). Unfortunately, like |
17 |
> anywhere else in this world, not everyone will agree on where that |
18 |
> balance point should be. There will always be extremists on both ends |
19 |
> of the debate. It is the developers votes that will determine which end |
20 |
> of the spectrum the balance point will be. It is also prudent for them |
21 |
> to vote in someone that can see both ends of the spectrum ;) |
22 |
|
23 |
Nothing is an absolute. I'm not saying that anyone who doesn't like |
24 |
something a maintainer does should be able to force the maintainer to do |
25 |
what they want. |
26 |
|
27 |
Chithanh, please stop me and correct me if I am wrong. |
28 |
|
29 |
The way I understand what you are saying is that you believe the |
30 |
maintainers have absolute authority over what happens with their |
31 |
packages. So if I file a bug against a package requesting a change that |
32 |
I think would bring the package more in line with the gentoo philosophy for |
33 |
example and explain to the maintainer why I think that is the case and |
34 |
He closes my bug invalid or wontfix, you feel that I should not take my |
35 |
concerns to qa or the council. correct? |
36 |
|
37 |
What happens if I am actually a co-maintainer but another co-maintainer |
38 |
blocks my changes? |
39 |
|
40 |
imo there should be, and is, an arbitration path for this sort of thing. |
41 |
|
42 |
William |