| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/01/2013 07:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 10/01/2013 06:27 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 10/01/2013 03:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> That isn't to say that I won't fairly evaluate appeals, but I'm |
| 9 |
>>> not going to second-guess every little temporary list ban. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> No one here dares to ban long-term trolls from the list. They |
| 13 |
>> are tolerated. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This contributes nothing to the discussion does it? From what I |
| 17 |
> can tell, it's you who are trolling right now and tries to derail |
| 18 |
> the discussion. The ComRel was formed only a week ago and no trolls |
| 19 |
> have appeared since then. Or do you just want us to start banning |
| 20 |
> people to prove that we are willing to do it? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
No, I'm just explaining my view on the usefulness of shaping CoC |
| 24 |
wording and stating that our MLs are practically not moderated. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That is not trolling. So yes, it is yet to prove that something has |
| 27 |
actually changed. Do you want me to open a new thread for this comment? |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSSxLjAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzpEAH/2p/iB9AyZ6H1s/vqDNL7dfH |
| 33 |
6SNcEFlO/ixkmyrqfc8kj+/bPKan2NIvwkya7o8wK6YCpU4TiMpbDE4Gn7wcmNGw |
| 34 |
pMWOP0B3mIqqQdTUfLp0DOwAjyU9SA23N5DWFF0McB83WapyIWezwKoaOkOXnF5O |
| 35 |
G+OgNzVzLtIxwkuPNb7DEmGXk+RxhqfQpcOTC+8DN5EcxYI7jJ5dzEvd/EIPvTN4 |
| 36 |
6jRyLyEk8ZF37v0lzVxPBRSsKBF+H7J47cdRx905gsUU5vvKBOysxjCI+QirDaL2 |
| 37 |
PiOzGQcRslme6CquCiNl32naunzxeGRNUAoI5AlKDqqbuDY6tBOFz3TC+NC+l4A= |
| 38 |
=Qt/h |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives