| 1 |
On 7/4/19 10:33 PM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Note that (1) above is pretty vague, which is where i think all the leeway |
| 3 |
> comes into place in terms of the power the community lets the council have |
| 4 |
> (regardless of the actual text of the GLEP). It reminds me of the Commerce |
| 5 |
> Clause[3] in the US where the literal text of the amendment gives the |
| 6 |
> government broad regulatory authority. In the case of Gentoo, the Council's |
| 7 |
> authority extends only so far as the community tolerates them classifying |
| 8 |
> problems as 'global' (which is their clear purview) vs a local problem, |
| 9 |
> where its clearly the domain of a project lead or individual developer. I |
| 10 |
> don't expect a clearly written policy to cover all the ground here (because |
| 11 |
> there is too much ground to cover.) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
the requirement for an issue to be global isn't a very high bar. e.g an |
| 14 |
expectation for a negative PR feedback from outsiders of Gentoo makes an |
| 15 |
issue global per se, so I still stick to my original answer. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 19 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 20 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives