1 |
I think the fact that this post about comrel wound up stirring up angry |
2 |
hurt feelings from the past is evidence that there may have been some |
3 |
serious errors in the past. |
4 |
|
5 |
I would at least like to see that this sort of mistake doesn't happen |
6 |
again. |
7 |
|
8 |
William's appeal, though apparently meritorious, might be off topic to |
9 |
this general discussion about comrel policy? |
10 |
|
11 |
Ok, so the issues I see so far |
12 |
|
13 |
* William was apparently never notified of the ban from nfp |
14 |
|
15 |
Solution: When someone is banned from any venue, they are notified by |
16 |
some sort of official means. NOBODY should be surprised after the |
17 |
fact, especially if comrel intends to enforce consequences with |
18 |
suspending developer privileges in the event of a breach. |
19 |
|
20 |
If this is not already the case, it should be. |
21 |
|
22 |
I would propose: |
23 |
|
24 |
- When someone has been removed or blocked or banned, and they are a |
25 |
gentoo developer, in addition to the enforcement measures, there should |
26 |
be an email sent to the developer's @gentoo address or some other means |
27 |
of communication that is registered. |
28 |
|
29 |
- If this notification is not issued, then comrel should not suspend |
30 |
people for violating the ban if they didn't know about it. |