1 |
On 06/26/2018 06:54 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
2 |
> On 18-06-26 18:27:14, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
3 |
>> On 06/26/2018 09:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
>>> W dniu wto, 26.06.2018 o godzinie 09∶11 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny |
5 |
>>> napisał: |
6 |
>>>> To improve readability of the thread, I'll ask my question in reply to |
7 |
>>>> myself ;-). |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> And I'd like to ask the inevitable question: what do you think should be |
11 |
>>> the roles of Gentoo Council and Trustees appropriately? |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> The Trustees should make sure the bills are paid and affairs are in |
15 |
>> order so that the light are on for the distribution, of which the |
16 |
>> Council handles. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> What about ensuring that the following situation does not happen. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Lawsuit is filed against the foundation because of inaction or |
22 |
> inappropriate action by members of the distro. Who is responsible for |
23 |
> remediating that situation? It involves both the foundation and the |
24 |
> 'distro'. Further, who is responsible for ensuring the situation does |
25 |
> not occur in the first place? |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I don't see where inaction can be relevant for distro per se, that is |
29 |
mainly an issue for trustees that have a fiduciary duty to the |
30 |
stakeholders. There are also very few cases where "inappropriate action" |
31 |
by a distro developer has any legal ramification for the foundation, as |
32 |
there is no employment contract to constitute HR relevant matters, but |
33 |
that is why there is ComRel. |
34 |
|
35 |
The first thing that should be done to ensure it doesn't happen is of |
36 |
course for Trustees to start doing _anything_ in order to fix the |
37 |
outstanding matters. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
41 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
42 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |