1 |
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday, January 16, 2017 1:54:21 PM EST Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Do you still have any archived info on SPI and the research you did? |
4 |
> Yes, but I was very big on being 100% transparent, so it should all be public |
5 |
> on the -nfp mailing list. I can see if I have some stuff that is not public to |
6 |
> make public, irc logs, etc. |
7 |
|
8 |
That's how ti should be. My messages go back to around mid 2007. If it |
9 |
is late 2007 or after, the subject line alone should help me find it. |
10 |
|
11 |
> |
12 |
>> Did you ever contact SPI directly and still have those messages?? |
13 |
> I recall I did contact the SPI. I have email proof of me saying such to other |
14 |
> trustees. In which I stated I did not want to repeat myself to other public |
15 |
> information. I just found another mention of such in an -nfp post. Looking for |
16 |
> original post and will provide a link. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I will have to look into my IRC log archives for further details. Any email |
19 |
> contacted was cc'd to -nfp list. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks much. So far what I've read on the SPI site is along the lines |
23 |
of what you have posted. I do believe that Debian is special as you |
24 |
posted in another post tho. Also, this is what I found about legal |
25 |
services: |
26 |
|
27 |
"SPI has access to legal counsel which the board may consult on behalf |
28 |
of the project, at the discretion of the board." |
29 |
|
30 |
To me, that seems to be very limited and may not even be available |
31 |
depending on whether SPI thinks it's needed. |
32 |
|
33 |
Dale |
34 |
|
35 |
:-) :-) |