| 1 |
On 03/31/18 17:48, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> You act as if Gentoo is doing something egregious here. In fact, I'm |
| 6 |
>> not aware of any organization that operates in the manner you suggest. |
| 7 |
>> If you were aware of one you'd be citing it instead of arguing in the |
| 8 |
>> abstract. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Please pardon my language, but I think your comment merits this kind of |
| 12 |
> response -- are you fucking kidding me? |
| 13 |
Actually, it does not, we have quite enough noise on the lists, do |
| 14 |
kindly avoid adding to it with aggressive vapidity. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> So you are unaware of any |
| 17 |
> organization that produces software which solicits feedback from the people |
| 18 |
> who actually use the software? EVERY organization does this. |
| 19 |
Both "sides" would do well to recall their strawmen, lest a stray spark |
| 20 |
find them. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Find me one |
| 23 |
> that doesn't. The burden of proof is on you. |
| 24 |
As you have a stated position, specifically that this User |
| 25 |
Representatives proposal would resolve (largely unspecified) problems, |
| 26 |
the burden of proof in that regard is very much upon you.[1] Unless of |
| 27 |
course you merely intend to play "I'm rubber, you're glue", in which |
| 28 |
case my previous request regarding vapid noise applies. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_%28philosophy%29 |
Archives