| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why not do both? I have been thinking along those lines too. I think |
| 3 |
> improvements are possible in both areas. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Makes sense, but I'd still be careful with computer-based-testing. I |
| 6 |
find that those kinds of stupid quizzes/etc drive me up the wall at |
| 7 |
work when I'm taking them (regulated environment, so lots of |
| 8 |
compliance-driven stuff like this), so if the goal is to not deter |
| 9 |
people from signing up we should make sure they're minimal and |
| 10 |
effective. We don't want to say "hey, with this tool we can now ask |
| 11 |
the candidates 300 questions and it takes none of our time at all to |
| 12 |
grade the responses!" |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives