| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:51 AM, NP-Hardass <np.hardass@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> So, in summary, my suggestion is to consider transforming the quiz process |
| 4 |
> into two separate sections, the first is a standard text based test like the |
| 5 |
> current system, and the second is an (semi-)interactive system where the |
| 6 |
> user has to problem solve, giving a more practical approach to quiz |
| 7 |
> questions. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The current process is more interactive than the quiz itself might |
| 11 |
suggest. After the quiz is completed there is an interview to go over |
| 12 |
it. This allows for free discussion. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
One of the goals is to focus on interaction between the candidate and |
| 15 |
the recruiter, because they are assessing maturity/social skills/etc |
| 16 |
in addition to technical ones. In addition to having the knowledge |
| 17 |
that they shouldn't go messing with eclasses without posting them on |
| 18 |
-dev or whatever, we want to make sure they have the sense/maturity to |
| 19 |
actually do it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Certainly that is something that is impossible to accomplish in a |
| 22 |
perfect way, but it is still important. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So, I'd probably focus more on interactivity between the candidate and |
| 25 |
a recruiter/mentor/whatever, and less on interactivity between the |
| 26 |
recruit and some kind of computer-based-training software. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Rich |
Archives