Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:03:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20590.40556.939437.204618@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I would suggest adding a repoman warning for adding new ebuilds with |
| 4 | > EAPI={1,2,3} now, turn that into an error for EAPI 1 in a short time |
| 5 | > (3 months?), then do the same for EAPI 2 a short while later with a |
| 6 | > longer timeline (as there are substantially more ebuilds with EAPI 2) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I don't see any advantage in deprecating intermediate EAPIs, before we |
| 9 | deprecate EAPI 0. What problem are you trying to solve? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |