Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:02:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_mz9he7miCatepBR0oaf7Up-qM84QEUKEWfjWWeDGzirQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I don't see any advantage in deprecating intermediate EAPIs, before we |
| 4 | > deprecate EAPI 0. What problem are you trying to solve? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | ++ |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'm all for a policy that says to use slot deps whenever appropriate, |
| 10 | or to otherwise do things that actually have a real impact on the |
| 11 | quality/functionality of the distro. That might in practice mean |
| 12 | using newer EAPIs on a lot of stuff. However, I don't see the value |
| 13 | in bumping for its own sake. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Legislate outcomes, not details. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | Jeff Horelick <jdhore@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |