1 |
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018, 11:19:38 PM GMT+1, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera <nado@××××××××××.be> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
>> Suppose the official portage tree has an ebuild named category/package/package-1.0-r1.ebuild. |
4 |
> You can name it,no need for mystery ;) |
5 |
|
6 |
I was just being generic because there are several packages I'd like to change or add. |
7 |
One of them being Samba. |
8 |
|
9 |
> I invite you to consult the revbump article (https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html). |
10 |
> The fact that you should edit in place or create a revbump (copy) is not impacted by the git workflow but by the changes affecting the tree. |
11 |
> Whats the modification you intend to do? |
12 |
|
13 |
There's a trivial change I'd like to apply to the samba ebuilds. I'd like to restore something that was mysteriously removed years ago: pam winbind authentication configuration file. |
14 |
More here: |
15 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/590374 |
16 |
and here: https://590374.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=496430 |
17 |
|
18 |
This is what I did with git, but I think I messed up because maybe I should have edited the existing ebuilds instead of creating another revision (my change is not critical, does not affect in any way users using the previous ebuilds; however, it does "install additional files that could be useful to the user"): |
19 |
|
20 |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/10578 |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks, |
23 |
|
24 |
Vieri |