| 1 |
Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <bicatali@g.o>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> it is masked. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> ... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs |
| 7 |
>> and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem |
| 8 |
>> less urgent. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> we do not have to come up with solutions for glpk api breaks. i could |
| 12 |
> have simply not bump glpk in the tree and there will be no bugs. |
| 13 |
> masking or subslot dependencies is what we can do without diving into |
| 14 |
> upstream code. obviously patches are welcome. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Looking at 4ti2 in particular, that's a substantial amount of code. If you |
| 17 |
fix it, that would pretty much get you ownership of it, but I see you already |
| 18 |
have a fork on github with a few commits, Thomas. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So you are after glpk documentation on how to migrate? I haven't seen anything |
| 21 |
useful on glpk's mailing list but it wouldn't hurt to ask there. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Francois |
Archives